Accused Queensland Health fraudster Joel Morehu-Barlow lived it up with $11m lifestyle

WHILE accused fraudster Joel Morehu-Barlow sits in a solitary jail cell at Wacol prison an entertainment package worth nearly $100,000 is en route from Europe for him.

Accused Fraudster Queensland Health

Accused Fraudster Queensland Health

Only days before the accused fraudster became the state’s most-wanted man and was eventually charged with defrauding $11 million, he was having the time of his life, enjoying a lavish spending spree.

The 36-year-old purchased an opulent $5.65 million River House in the new Pietra development at Moray St, New Farm, and paid for it in full.

But the spending didn’t stop there – his extravagant lifestyle was just beginning.

Court documents reveal Morehu-Barlow went on to purchase items including a top-of-the-range 2.15m 3D TV described as one of “the most expensive sets ever produced”.

He purchased the TV and associated accessories for $95,070 from Bang and Olufsen’s Fortitude Valley store. But little did he know the exclusive entertainment package which was sent from Denmark was due to arrive in Australia when he would behind bars.

The goods will be seized once they arrive in Australia.

During his short-lived spree he also purchased a luxury Mercedes-Benz and two top-of-the-range jet skis.

He also bought an elaborate, grey, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG sedan for $135,214.

He then went on to buy two Sea-Doo jet skis at Brisbane Jet Skis at Zillmere on Brisbane’s northside.

One was a luxury performance model and the other a sports model, together costing more $42,000.

But he had little time to use his new plush toys, he would be arrested by police only eight days after he bought them. Documents show the self-proclaimed Tahitian prince was known by various names including Hohepa Morehu-Barlow, Joel Barlow, Joseph Barlow and Joel Hikairo Morehu-Barlow.

In the documents it reveals he held eight bank accounts with more than $1.5 million in them and another account in his company’s name which had a healthy balance of $2.91 million.

He also owned another two luxury cars – a grey, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG sedan and a 2004, silver BMW 530i sedan.

Morehu-Barlow was also interested in music and art and had a selection of paintings and a baby grand piano.

(The Courier-Mail, Sophie Elsworth, 16/12/2011)

Finding Assets

Finding Assets that have been deliberately hidden from you can be a key part to a divorce, litigation, fraud investigation or business dissolution.

What country are you searching in?

The most important factor to finding assets can be the country in which you are searching. If you are searching for assets in a country that has good online property, electoral roll, corporate register and other databases, then these searches can be done relatively quickly and inexpensively.

If you are searching for assets in a country where online searches can’t be conducted, then you may need to engage local experts to obtain this information. In some cases, local lawyers or investigators can enquire in a particular town or village as to property being held in the area. These searches can be time consuming and not always reliable.

Type of Asset

Most of the searches that Rushmore Forensic conduct relate to finding hidden property, businesses and bank accounts both in Australia and overseas.

In many cases, searches for property and businesses can result in success as information relating to these asset types is publicly available. Finding hidden bank accounts is much more difficult and in most cases, a solicitor in the country where the asset is located will need to be engaged.

Like any investigation or litigation, one of the key factors is having good documentation in relation to the assets that you are searching for. If you have a bank statement from an overseas bank then this can be a key part to finding and recovering funds. If you do not know the name of the bank together with account numbers, then the search becomes much more difficult.

Search Time

Online searches to find assets can be undertaken in a matter of hours, however if this is not an option then you may need to resort to more time consuming searches. Hiring a private investigator can be a good option in some asset searches. Most private investigators can be engaged for as little as $100 per hour in capital cities and slightly more in regional areas. The use of this type of investigator can yield surprising results and may be the difference as to whether you are able to find and recover the funds you are looking for.

More Information

If you would like more information about Finding Assets, then please don’t hesitate to contact us on an obligation free basis.

Giant divorce claim could be Australia’s costliest split – but it can’t match these billionaire bust-ups

Could this be Australia’s biggest ever divorce claim? An Adelaide woman has lodged a divorce claim worth well over $25 million against her ex-husband in what has become one of the most bitter marriage splits in history.

According to a report in The Australian, the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, applied to the Family Court for a $278,000 monthly support payment for herself and her only son.

While the Court rejected this claim, she is pushing ahead for a final settlement from the divorce that would see her receive more than $24 million in property (including a Swiss chalet) and other payments. Her former husband is contesting.

The bitter legal battle – the paper says the pair has been to court on 28 separate occasions – would have to be one of Australia’s biggest divorce cases.

However, even if the woman manages to win a big payout in the final settlement, she is unlikely to match Australia’s two members of the BRW Rich 200 list who have earned a big part of their fortunes from divorce settlements: Nicole Kidman and Lynette Harvey.

Kidman, valued on this year’s list with a fortune of $329 million, received a divorce settlement worth a reported $109 million when she split from actor Tom Cruise in 2001.

Lynette Harvey, the former wife of retail king Gerry Harvey, retained a large stake in Harvey Norman when the couple split in 1982. She was listed on this year’s Rich 200 with a fortune of $205 million; her stake in Harvey Norman is worth more than $170 million.

But these splits are dwarfed by what is widely seen as the biggest divorce settlement in history, finalised earlier this year – the split between US casino mogul Steve Wynn and his wife Elaine.

The pair, who have actually divorced twice (they first married in 1963, broke up in 1986 and then remarried five years later), finalised their latest settlement in January.

According to Forbes, Elaine ended up with 11,076,708 shares in Wynn Resorts as part of the settlement; based on the company’s share price, that stake is worth just over $1.06 billion.

Another billionaire bust-up that is in the process of being settled is the split between Formula One supremo Bernie Ecclestone and his ex-wife Slavica. An official cost to the split has yet to be determined, but initial estimates said the settlement could be as high as $1.7 billion.

Prior to the Wynn’s divorce settlement, the biggest divorce on record was paid by US mobile phone industry pioneer Craig McCaw, who sold a group of mobile phone assets to AT&T in 1994 for $US11.5 billion. Less than a year later, Craig and his wife Wendy split.

In the bitter divorce battle that followed, everyone from Craig’s elderly mother to Bill Gates was called to give evidence. Eventually, Wendy walked away with $US460 million in shares in telco Nextel. Unfortunately for her, those shares later tanked during the tech wreck of 2001.

(Source:  James Thomson, Smart Company, 11/06/10)

About Rushmore Forensic

Rushmore Forensic is a forensic accounting firm based in Sydney. We specialise in the investigation, and valuation of businesses subject to family law/divorce disputes.

Superannuation fraud syndicate in Sydney

The ACCC has reminded consumers to be careful in protecting their superannuation account statements in particular and all their personal information more generally.

The Minister for Superannuation and Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry, recently issued a warning for Australian workers to exercise extra care in protecting their superannuation account statements and personal details. This is in response to information from the New South Wales Police Force that a Sydney-based fraud syndicate is using stolen identities to steal from victims’ superannuation accounts.

Syndicate members have allegedly stolen superannuation statements and used other counterfeit identity documents to set up self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs). The offenders then open bank accounts and arrange for cash to be “rolled over” from legitimate funds into the fraudulent accounts.

The minister has advised that the vast majority of Australian workers have superannuation funds that are regulated by the Australian Prudential and Regulatory Authority (APRA). These funds are protected by law against theft and fraud. However, consumers should always be vigilant and careful to protect their personal information.

Fraudsters can use personal information to steal your identity.

Identity theft works in a range of ways, from simple methods to well organised scams. Many of us have a wealth of personal information readily available—cards in our wallet, mail, public records, information saved in our computers and information posted on social networking sites.

Identity theft can happen easily and quickly. By leaving your personal information readily available, scammers will have easy access to this information. For example, fraudsters will pay people to rummage through rubbish tips and steal letters, household bills and bank statements (also referred to as “dumpster diving”) to collect personal information.

The following are some Warning signs to watch out for:

  • You notice that amounts of money go missing from your bank account without any explanation.
  • You are unable to obtain credit or a loan because of an unexplainable bad credit rating.
  • A caller pushes you to provide personal information and discourages you from checking whether it’s a genuine request.
  • You get an email or a telephone call out of the blue asking you to “validate” or “confirm” banking details.

Protect yourself

  • Regularly check your credit card, bank and superannuation statements to ensure that suspicious transactions are detected.
  • Shred all documents containing personal information, such as credit card applications and bank statements. NEVER send money or give personal details to people you don’t know and trust.
  • If you receive a call from your bank or any other organisation, don’t provide your personal details—instead ask for their name and a contact number.
  • Check with the organisation in question before calling back. Never rely on a number provided in an email or click on the provided link—instead find the contact number through an internet search or back of your automatic teller machine (ATM) card.
  • Log directly on to a website that you are interested in rather than clicking on links provided in an email.
  • Always get independent advice if you are unsure whether an offer/request is genuine.

(Source: ACCC)

Read more about what fraudulent behaviors to watch out for on the Rushmore Forensic blog.

About Rushmore Forensic

Andrew Firth is a Forensic Accountant in Sydney and Director of Rushmore Forensic.  He has over 12 years experience investigating accounting irregularities, undertaking corporate intelligence and conducting other forensic accounting assignments.  Andrew is a former investigator with the Serious Fraud Office in the UK.  He has also worked for KPMG and Deloitte during his career. Andrew is based in Sydney and provides forensic accounting services throughout Australia.  If you have a matter which requires expert advice, please don’t hesitate to contact Andrew Firth for a complimentary and confidential discussion.

Fraud – What do you do when it strikes your business?

Fraud is a fact of life and if you are in business it’s only a matter of time until you are forced to deal with it. Andrew Firth, a forensic accountant in Sydney explains what to do.

If you are dealing with employee fraud then the first step is to identify what electronic devices could contain potential evidence. The employees’ computer, laptop, phone, PDA, or Blackberry may contain information that is useful to the subsequent investigation. If the computer is turned on, most people will be tempted to go through the computer looking for information.

The first thing to do is to instruct relevant people not to touch the computer and to consult a forensic accountant or forensic technology professional. If you need to shut the computer down, then close any documents whilst taking notes of what you are doing. You will need to secure the computer to prevent unauthorised access. Take the computer and lock it in a secure cabinet or office until it can be passed to a forensic professional. Always take notes of what you have done including dates and times. Also remember to secure any other corporate devices of the individual concerned e.g. PDA and Phones. Remember not to use the devices simply turn them off until professional advice can be sought.

How do you handle documents that may be relevant to the fraud investigation? The first rule is not to write, mark or otherwise handle the document. Secure the documents in a safe place until a forensic accountant can be consulted. Also take notes of what you do as these will be important in establishing the chain of evidence in potential court proceedings.

In many corporate environments there will be pressure from management to use the computer or device particularly if its needed for customer or client operational needs. If this is the case, then the computer and other devices need to be forensically imaged by a forensic technology professional and the image of the device can be provided to management. The original device is secured and should not be used until all court proceedings have been exhausted. Your forensic accountant can organise for a forensic technology professional to be engaged to perform these tasks.

Forensic accountants also find that email systems are a critical source of information when investigating employee frauds. The suspects email inbox and other folders need to be forensically captured. Email on company back up tapes can also be used to identify correspondence and documents at different points in time. A Forensic accountant or forensic technology professional will be able to advise you on capturing the emails successfully.

The next common occurrence in organisations is that people think it’s a good idea to confront the suspect and to “interrogate’ them.  Interviews with the suspect should not occur unless advised by legal counsel who is familiar with employee fraud. It’s critical that contact with the suspect is minimised until you know what you are dealing with. Again bringing in a forensic accountant to essentially project manage the investigation will ensure that potential evidence is protected and legal and other advice is obtained when appropriate.

Many organisations are reluctant to bring in forensic accountants as they are concerned that the matter may be adversely reported in the media. In our experience we find that the use of a forensic accountant can minimise the risks involved and can provide crucial advice to the organisation.  In many instances, a forensic accountant can recover funds that have been defrauded and liaise with legal counsel, the police or other law enforcement bodies if needed. Above all we find that the use of an expert forensic accountant can quickly minimise the impact of a fraud, recover the funds and really manage the issue until resolution. Fraud investigation has many commercial, legal and regulatory issues and the timing and sequence of activities can have an important effect on the outcome of the matter. Many large corporations also draft a formal corporate policy which documents how an investigation needs to be conducted. These are useful documents as they clearly delineate the responsibilities of Human Resources, Internal Audit, Legal, and the Finance departments.

About the Author

Andrew Firth is a Forensic Accountant in Sydney and Director of Rushmore Forensic.  He has over 12 years experience in financial investigations, corporate intelligence and other aspects of forensic accounting.  Andrew is a former investigator with the Serious Fraud Office in the UK.  He has also worked for KPMG and Deloitte during his career. Andrew is based in Sydney and provides forensic accounting services throughout Australia, New Zealand and South East Asia.  If you have a matter which requires expert advice, please don’t hesitate to contact Andrew Firth for a complimentary and confidential discussion.

Sick Leave Fraud – Spike in leave before and after weekends and holidays

Public servants, especially those living along the coast, take more sick leave than employees in the private sector, with a spike in days off before and after weekends and holidays, a report has found.

The NSW Auditor-General, Peter Achterstraat, has found that, despite efforts to reduce the high level of sick leave, there has been a drop of only 1.84 hours, or just one-quarter of a day, since 2004/5.

This was much less than the target of a reduction of one day over this period, which would have saved taxpayers $45 million, he said.

Abuse of sick leave needs to be addressed properly” he said.

On average, public servants take just over eight days’ sick leave annually, he said.

The highest sick leave taken was recorded by the NSW Fire Brigades at 95.3 hours, which is significantly more than the next highest group, Ambulance NSW, at 79.8 hours and Juvenile Justice at 78.6 hours.

The report also found that the more public servants are paid, the less sick leave they take and that sick leave increased with age and with length of service.

The higher the sick leave entitlement, the more sick leave was taken, the report noted.

Mr Achterstraat called for supervisors to more actively monitor and manage staff suspected of abusing sick leave and to have clear rules for managing absence.

The key barriers in reducing sick leave were an ageing workforce, an industrial environment which slows workplace reform, and an entitlement culture where staff think they must ‘use it or lose it’” the report noted.

The director general of the Department of Premier and Cabinet said programs were being pursued to reduce sick leave to 45.06 hours per employee, as part of recent wages agreements.

The Auditor-General has called for a “name and shame” list to be published by the government, which is likely to occur next year.

(Source: “Sickies by the seaside: report points the finger”, SMH 8/12/10, Brian Robins)

About Rushmore Forensic

Andrew Firth is a Director of Rushmore Forensic.  He specialises at using advanced data mining routines to detect payroll fraud. He is a forensic accountant based in Sydney, and is a regular speaker on payroll and other forensic accounting issues.